|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 12, 2011 19:23:12 GMT -6
That doesn't explain why the tail never left a mark on the building. Or how a simple bird smashes the nose when hit during flight?
I hope you're not saying a simple jet fuel(kerosene) fire melts aluminum now, are you?
You also never address the CNN reporter's statements who was on the scene?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2011 19:41:51 GMT -6
Questions, questions, questions...NEVER an answer acceptable to non-Truthernuts.
|
|
|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 12, 2011 19:56:44 GMT -6
Maybe if we didn't have to file lawsuits 10 years later to get info from the government, some of these questions would be answered?
"On September 6, 2011, the appellant’s opening brief was entered before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Monaghan v. Department of Justice, dismissed earlier this year by the U.S. District Court of Nevada. This action seeks the release of numerous FBI records regarding the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, including the actual audio recording obtained from the c.o.c.k.pit-voice-recorder for United Airlines Flight 93, plus Pentagon and Shanksville, PA crash scene evidence collection records."(Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Court)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2011 20:00:07 GMT -6
NEVER an answer acceptable to non-Truthernuts.
Ever.
|
|
|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 12, 2011 20:13:01 GMT -6
Why does the government fight the release of the documents and flight recordings then? You're claiming they have produced the evidence.....it appears you're wrong again!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2011 20:56:01 GMT -6
Why does the government fight the release of the documents and flight recordings then? You're claiming they have produced the evidence.....it appears you're wrong again! Could you answer if you think President Obama was somehow involved in this conspiracy?
|
|
|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 12, 2011 21:01:49 GMT -6
Please! This guy can't even get his birth certificate straightened out.
Short answer......Well since Obama is claiming he killed a man who was already dead(Osama), what do you think? Anyone who was in the CIA( and his family), tells lies for a living.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2011 21:47:46 GMT -6
Please! This guy can't even get his birth certificate straightened out. Short answer......Well since Obama is claiming he killed a man who was already dead(Osama), what do you think? Anyone who was in the CIA( and his family), tells lies for a living. I don't know what you think. For arguments sake, just answer the question. Yes or no? There's more than meets your eyes.
|
|
|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 13, 2011 16:43:30 GMT -6
To answer your question, he wasn't involved on 9/11 but is now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2011 19:13:44 GMT -6
To answer your question, he wasn't involved on 9/11 but is now. If you don't think the President was involved, how can you say he is now involved in something that was orchestrated ten years ago? Are you suggesting the President has a special time-travel machine that he can use to magically travel back in time? Or is it possible President Obama is as helpless as you? I think you assume the President of the United States has more authority than in reality, and you're missing the big picture. You need to take a step back and change your glasses. www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/topsecretamerica/Mission accomplished!
|
|
|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 13, 2011 19:23:27 GMT -6
When you become President, you are made privvy to things that are above top secret. Yet, writng legislation is not one of the President's duties.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2011 20:02:13 GMT -6
When you become President, you are made privvy to things that are above top secret. Yet, writng legislation is not one of the President's duties. Really? Show me that's true. Why don't you explain why President Carter wasn't given privvy to all information the US had regarding something as unimportant as UFO incidents/claims. That was in the late 1970s and things have drastically changed since then. northsider has already tried to set you straight on the subject and process but you seem to be mistakenly stubborn and set in your ways as to who can author legislation. Anyone can author a bill/legislation (especially a President), but only Congress with the President can authorize it. Are you relying on the US Constitution or the Tea Party Rewrite?
|
|
|
Post by northsider on Sept 13, 2011 20:39:02 GMT -6
Have you read the popular mechanics article on debunking the 911 myths, freedom? If so, why are their results unsatisfactory? Also, as it pertains to your unwillingness to even consider a plane hitting the pentagon, how do you rationalize away the burnt wheel hub from a Boeing 757 found in the petagon debris that was pictured in that article.
|
|
|
Post by freedom12 on Sept 13, 2011 20:58:07 GMT -6
Popular Mechnics wrote TWO articles on it and yes, I've read both.
As for the "burnt wheel hub", it hasn't been proven it's from a 757.
As posted previously-
"On September 6, 2011, the appellant’s opening brief was entered before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Monaghan v. Department of Justice, dismissed earlier this year by the U.S. District Court of Nevada. This action seeks the release of numerous FBI records regarding the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, including the actual audio recording obtained from the c.o.c.k.pit-voice-recorder for United Airlines Flight 93, plus Pentagon and Shanksville, PA crash scene evidence collection records."(Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit Court)
There are many such cases currently in the court system and many more dimissed. If the "burnt wheel hub" is from is from Flight 77, the government could simply provide the info requested in any of the court requests/challenges. Still, 10 yrs later, they continue to fight releasing info that has no reason to be kept from the public.
Would a flight recorder tape threaten National security? No!
Would evidence collection records from Shanksville and the Pentagon threaten National security? No!
Why hide the evidence if they have it?
Why aren't Americans demanding it be released?
I guess we're all too interested in American Idol and Dancing with the Stars to care!
|
|
|
Post by northsider on Sept 13, 2011 21:12:01 GMT -6
Popular mechanics seemed convinced the hub was from a 757. The side by side pictures of the burnt hub and a wheel hub on a 757 looked like the same hub to me. What evidence do you have proving the wheel hub photographed at the pentagon is not from a 757?
|
|