|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 1, 2015 21:57:30 GMT -6
The store has been open for over three months and has nine months left on its lease. We should be signing a one year lease for the second floor this afternoon. The people taking the second floor have interest in purchasing, I'll probably take down all the ads once we sign the lease. Congratulations. Hopefully they will buy it. Bad news dog, the prospective tenant who was interested in buying the building already had some red flags, then he delayed the signing of the lease and some things that he said didn't seem to add up, so that deal seems to be dead. I signed a lease with another family and have pulled the ads. I am perfectly fine with holding on to my building, there are other projects I'd like to do there, perhaps even some more of my artwork if you need a bright side to look at.
|
|
|
Post by chevypower on Oct 2, 2015 1:42:17 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 2, 2015 6:20:01 GMT -6
Aww, a rainbow sticker, isn't that nice? You always have so much relevant matter to add to the conversation. Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building and the residents that they plan to force to be part of the City that they located on the outside of the limits of to try to make them feel better about being subjected to the yearly tax increases and decreasing services. Do you think that will make those people feel better? I think maybe some lubricant would be a better choice.
|
|
|
Post by dog on Oct 2, 2015 7:39:18 GMT -6
Congratulations. Hopefully they will buy it. Bad news dog, the prospective tenant who was interested in buying the building already had some red flags, then he delayed the signing of the lease and some things that he said didn't seem to add up, so that deal seems to be dead. I signed a lease with another family and have pulled the ads. Doesn't sound like it is entirely bad news. At least you got another family in there to make use of the space and provide you with more income.
|
|
|
Post by dog on Oct 2, 2015 7:42:57 GMT -6
Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building. I haven't had a chance to talk to the owners yet, but I had heard that they said they wish you would stay out of it and quit using them to fight your battle with the city and not let the problems you had with the city possibly hinder their efforts in selling their building.
|
|
|
Post by chevypower on Oct 2, 2015 21:30:05 GMT -6
Aww, a rainbow sticker, isn't that nice? You always have so much relevant matter to add to the conversation. Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building and the residents that they plan to force to be part of the City that they located on the outside of the limits of to try to make them feel better about being subjected to the yearly tax increases and decreasing services. Do you think that will make those people feel better? I think maybe some lubricant would be a better choice. No, it was more of an idea how to paint the building you have, you know, kind of like giving you a helping hand for an idea. But you always find a negative response.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 2, 2015 21:35:05 GMT -6
Aww, a rainbow sticker, isn't that nice? You always have so much relevant matter to add to the conversation. Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building and the residents that they plan to force to be part of the City that they located on the outside of the limits of to try to make them feel better about being subjected to the yearly tax increases and decreasing services. Do you think that will make those people feel better? I think maybe some lubricant would be a better choice. No, it was more of an idea how to paint the building you have, you know, kind of like giving you a helping hand for an idea. But you always find a negative response. My building already has my paint job, don't you like it? Do you think I should paint the Main St. side?
|
|
|
Post by chevypower on Oct 2, 2015 21:38:20 GMT -6
yes!
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 2, 2015 21:46:27 GMT -6
Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building. I haven't had a chance to talk to the owners yet, but I had heard that they said they wish you would stay out of it and quit using them to fight your battle with the city and not let the problems you had with the city possibly hinder their efforts in selling their building. Who'd you hear that from? I saw them at the Council Meeting saying thank you as I came back from the podium after telling the Council how ridiculous I think C-2 zoning is for that property. I don't think I am doing anything to hinder her selling the building. I am trying to get our City leaders to be more business friendly, with more reaaonable zoning to give properties like hers more value, to help the comparable sales value of other real estate as well. Gee, have her call me if she thinks there is a problem with my talking about wanting our City leaders to be more business friendly and give more value to property here. I talked to someone just today from the sheet metal shop zoned to not allow business on that street and told him how I feel and what I've been talking about. He told me to keep up the good fight.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 3, 2015 0:47:02 GMT -6
Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building. I haven't had a chance to talk to the owners yet, but I had heard that they said they wish you would stay out of it and quit using them to fight your battle with the city and not let the problems you had with the city possibly hinder their efforts in selling their building. You don't believe that I am hindering the sale, do you? Certsinly with all of your business education and experience you realize that drastically slashing the demand for the building by structly limiting its use is hindering the sale more than anything any insignificant citizen can say about it being wrong, don't you? Doesn't it seem that if the City had started controlling the negative impacts of the bars eight years ago when I started asking that there could have been a much better chance that homeowners in the area wouldn't now be asking to limit business in that building so much? I've been working for eight years so that they would be able to sell their building without being hindered by the negative bar impacts, but our City leaders haven't been able to come up with a solution to the "increasing" problems yet. What a shame that the value of their building has been so drastically slashed, but the City Council has made their desicion. Who would want a 7500 sqft building that can only be used as a convienence store or a specialty shop with just a single variety of goods? I dodn't create this terrible situation though, our City leaders did. I'm just talking about what they've done.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 4, 2015 10:45:14 GMT -6
Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building. I haven't had a chance to talk to the owners yet, but I had heard that they said they wish you would stay out of it and quit using them to fight your battle with the city and not let the problems you had with the city possibly hinder their efforts in selling their building. Aren't you going to tell me who told you that? Doesn't it seem that your "hearsay" is incorrect considering that the owners were thanking me at the Council Meeting for speaking out about the issue that negatively affects my property too? Did you at least set them straight about it not being my battle? Certainly you know that I was only trying to work WITH the City and asking for what I want from our government that is supposed to be for the people and by the people, when they created THEIR battle against my family. Did you explain to them that I am not battling the City, that I even just recently attemted to work WITH them yet again to try to reopen the Majestic once more, have only been talking about what does happen here, and asking for the better that I want for our community? I noticed that you didn't disagree at all with my claim that my insignificant talking about the C-2 zoning being ridiculous and asking for more reasonable zoning is not really what is hindering the sale, but that our City so strictly limiting the use of the building is what is hindering it. It's so obvious that I'm not doing anything to hinder the sale like our City's overly restrictive zoning, that I'm surprised that you even posted such CRAP.
|
|
|
Post by dog on Oct 4, 2015 11:30:44 GMT -6
I haven't had a chance to talk to the owners yet, but I had heard that they said they wish you would stay out of it and quit using them to fight your battle with the city and not let the problems you had with the city possibly hinder their efforts in selling their building. Aren't you going to tell me who told you that? Doesn't it seem that your "hearsay" is incorrect considering that the owners were thanking me at the Council Meeting for speaking out about the issue that negatively affects my property too? Did you at least set them straight about it not being my battle? Certainly you know that I was only trying to work WITH the City and asking for what I want from our government that is supposed to be for the people and by the people, when they created THEIR battle against my family. Did you explain to them that I am not battling the City, that I even just recently attemted to work WITH them yet again to try to reopen the Majestic once more, have only been talking about what does happen here, and asking for the better that I want for our community? I noticed that you didn't disagree at all with my claim that my insignificant talking about the C-2 zoning being ridiculous and asking for more reasonable zoning is not really what is hindering the sale, but that our City so strictly limiting the use of the building is what is hindering it. It's so obvious that I'm not doing anything to hinder the sale like our City's overly restrictive zoning, that I'm surprised that you even posted such CRAP. Kyle Kyle Kyle. Isn't it possible that they thank you for speaking at the meeting but they don't want you bringing it up all the time on a forum? Wasn't it you yourself that brought up that you didn't want to be involved with a neighborhood watch because you thought that the vindictive attitude of the city may affect them? So why should this be any different? If and when I see the owners I will let you know if it is just hearsay or not.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 4, 2015 12:26:47 GMT -6
Aren't you going to tell me who told you that? Doesn't it seem that your "hearsay" is incorrect considering that the owners were thanking me at the Council Meeting for speaking out about the issue that negatively affects my property too? Did you at least set them straight about it not being my battle? Certainly you know that I was only trying to work WITH the City and asking for what I want from our government that is supposed to be for the people and by the people, when they created THEIR battle against my family. Did you explain to them that I am not battling the City, that I even just recently attemted to work WITH them yet again to try to reopen the Majestic once more, have only been talking about what does happen here, and asking for the better that I want for our community? I noticed that you didn't disagree at all with my claim that my insignificant talking about the C-2 zoning being ridiculous and asking for more reasonable zoning is not really what is hindering the sale, but that our City so strictly limiting the use of the building is what is hindering it. It's so obvious that I'm not doing anything to hinder the sale like our City's overly restrictive zoning, that I'm surprised that you even posted such CRAP. Kyle Kyle Kyle. Isn't it possible that they thank you for speaking at the meeting but they don't want you bringing it up all the time on a forum? Wasn't it you yourself that brought up that you didn't want to be involved with a neighborhood watch because you thought that the vindictive attitude of the city may affect them? So why should this be any different? If and when I see the owners I will let you know if it is just hearsay or not. dog, dog, dog, if they were on this forum seeing my posting about it, why wouldn't they just post or send me a message telling me of their wishes? My insignificantly posting my insignificant opinion that what they have done is wrong, doesn't make any difference anyways, right? Does it really matter what their wishes are, since I am only talking about what our City has already done? Doesn't the fact that what our City has done drives away business and slashes the value of a property that if sold will most likely considerably lower the appraised value of my building, make it somehting that I have every right to talk about? Don't you think there is a difference between being Community Service Coordinator of Nieghborhood Watch and my involvement with these people? Don't you think that our City leaders with the vindictive attitudes know that I am not at all connected with the property owners that I don't even know? Are you trying to imply that those vindictive leaders would take their vindictive attitudes out on the people who I don't even know, simply because I talk on a public forum and to the newspaper about it being wrong and hurting the value of mine and many other properties here? Do our City leaders base their decisions on who it is talking about the issue,, rather than by what is right and wrong or best for our community? That certainly would explain why we have so few businesses here, don't you think?
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 5, 2015 7:13:19 GMT -6
Kyle Kyle Kyle. Isn't it possible that they thank you for speaking at the meeting but they don't want you bringing it up all the time on a forum? Wasn't it you yourself that brought up that you didn't want to be involved with a neighborhood watch because you thought that the vindictive attitude of the city may affect them? So why should this be any different? If and when I see the owners I will let you know if it is just hearsay or not. dog, dog, dog, if they were on this forum seeing my posting about it, why wouldn't they just post or send me a message telling me of their wishes? My insignificantly posting my insignificant opinion that what they have done is wrong, doesn't make any difference anyways, right? Does it really matter what their wishes are, since I am only talking about what our City has already done? Doesn't the fact that what our City has done drives away business and slashes the value of a property that if sold will most likely considerably lower the appraised value of my building, make it somehting that I have every right to talk about? Don't you think there is a difference between being Community Service Coordinator of Nieghborhood Watch and my involvement with these people? Don't you think that our City leaders with the vindictive attitudes know that I am not at all connected with the property owners that I don't even know? Are you trying to imply that those vindictive leaders would take their vindictive attitudes out on the people who I don't even know, simply because I talk on a public forum and to the newspaper about it being wrong and hurting the value of mine and many other properties here? Do our City leaders base their decisions on who it is talking about the issue,, rather than by what is right and wrong or best for our community? That certainly would explain why we have so few businesses here, don't you think? If you do talk to the owners, please do ask them if they believe your claim that the City is using thier vindictive attitude to stop them from being able to sell their building because I am the one talking about it being wrong, or to explain their reasoning if they do think that I am doing anything to hinder the sale. Not that they are the ones who get to determine whether or.not I can talk about this very public issue that affects us all, but I am curious to know how anyone would think that my insignificant talking about my opinion on the matter could hinder the sale.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Mitchell on Oct 5, 2015 7:27:23 GMT -6
Maybe the City should offer rainbow stickers to the owners of the House of Furniture building. I haven't had a chance to talk to the owners yet, but I had heard that they said they wish you would stay out of it and quit using them to fight your battle with the city and not let the problems you had with the city possibly hinder their efforts in selling their building. FOT, anonymous, antalameen, and worthystreator, you all liked this post. Do you believe that our City leaders are or would use their vindictive attitude to hinder these people from being able to sell their building just because I am the one talking about the overly restrictive zoning being wrong? Do you have some other reason for thinking that my talking about it being wrong and asking our leaders for more reasonable zoning is actually hindering the sale, or do you just not like it that this situation highlights that the problems that I have been talking about for years are further validated as hurting our community?
|
|