Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2018 20:23:17 GMT -6
Federal prosecutors disagree. We can believe federal prosecutors or a guy on the internet that doesn't even know where Barack Obama was born. Well, I do have the advantage of actually READING the law, and studying case history and the comments of former Federal FEC officials, all of who point out nothing illegal has transpired. You might want to ask John Edwards how this works, and he didn't even use his own money. There's no comparison between what trump did and what Edwards did. See: US vs Cohen
|
|
|
Post by helencrump on Dec 13, 2018 20:45:55 GMT -6
Listening to Trump defenders' desperate attemts to shrug this off is not "studying case history". You're gonna roll with the Edwards defense, huh? If Trump made these payments to avoid personal embarrassment and not to influence the election, why did he make the payments right before the election and not a decade earlier when the affairs took place. Fact - Donald J Trump has been implicated in two federal campaign finance felonies that his former lawyer is going to serve prison time for. Did either of these women threaten to come forward and dish to Melania or his son a decade ago? I can easily believe he had just as much interest in protecting his personal interests than public. Especially since he didn’t try to pay off anyone else. Just the 2 that’d affect Melania and Baron. Personally I think he might’ve been concerned about Baron, who is so close to his mom. I think Melania is pretty d**n strong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2018 21:11:30 GMT -6
Listening to Trump defenders' desperate attemts to shrug this off is not "studying case history". You're gonna roll with the Edwards defense, huh? If Trump made these payments to avoid personal embarrassment and not to influence the election, why did he make the payments right before the election and not a decade earlier when the affairs took place. Fact - Donald J Trump has been implicated in two federal campaign finance felonies that his former lawyer is going to serve prison time for. Did either of these women threaten to come forward and dish to Melania or his son a decade ago? I can easily believe he had just as much interest in protecting his personal interests than public. Especially since he didn’t try to pay off anyone else. Just the 2 that’d affect Melania and Baron. Personally I think he might’ve been concerned about Baron, who is so close to his mom. I think Melania is pretty d**n strong. That would beg the question why didn't trump pay these women hush-money a decade ago, if he was concerned about his personal interests. Instead he paid them right before the election. On the other hand, John Edwards paid his side piece hush-money at the same time as his affair and long before the election.
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Dec 14, 2018 2:25:22 GMT -6
Well, I do have the advantage of actually READING the law, and studying case history and the comments of former Federal FEC officials, all of who point out nothing illegal has transpired. You might want to ask John Edwards how this works, and he didn't even use his own money. There's no comparison between what trump did and what Edwards did. See: US vs Cohen Well, we shall see how it unfolds, eh? I wish I could see your face when it all blows up.
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Dec 14, 2018 2:38:43 GMT -6
Well, I do have the advantage of actually READING the law, and studying case history and the comments of former Federal FEC officials, all of who point out nothing illegal has transpired. You might want to ask John Edwards how this works, and he didn't even use his own money. There's no comparison between what trump did and what Edwards did. See: US vs Cohen Further, please explain the functional differences between the Edwards case and this one ( other than the fact that Trump did in fact, use his own money ) This ought to be good.
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Dec 14, 2018 2:41:54 GMT -6
Did either of these women threaten to come forward and dish to Melania or his son a decade ago? I can easily believe he had just as much interest in protecting his personal interests than public. Especially since he didn’t try to pay off anyone else. Just the 2 that’d affect Melania and Baron. Personally I think he might’ve been concerned about Baron, who is so close to his mom. I think Melania is pretty d**n strong. That would beg the question why didn't trump pay these women hush-money a decade ago, if he was concerned about his personal interests. Instead he paid them right before the election. On the other hand, John Edwards paid his side piece hush-money at the same time as his affair and long before the election. SOURCES? In fact, the Bunny Mellons payment was during the election, and she was actually EMPLOYED by the Campaign...……… So lets see your "timeline".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2018 5:34:29 GMT -6
There's no comparison between what trump did and what Edwards did. See: US vs Cohen Well, we shall see how it unfolds, eh? I wish I could see your face when it all blows up. eh?? Don't pin your hopes on it. trump isn't. trump has already been named in an indictment for this, as individual 1 in Cohen's plea deal. Next comes the actual indictment with trump's name on it. Don't pretend to be shocked and horrified when it comes down, and it will.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2018 7:10:12 GMT -6
Well, we shall see how it unfolds, eh? I wish I could see your face when it all blows up. eh?? Don't pin your hopes on it. trump isn't. trump has already been named in an indictment for this, as individual 1 in Cohen's plea deal. Next comes the actual indictment with trump's name on it. Don't pretend to be shocked and horrified when it comes down, and it will. If they set this precedent and indict a sitting President it will come back to haunt them in the future.
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Dec 14, 2018 11:25:23 GMT -6
Well, we shall see how it unfolds, eh? I wish I could see your face when it all blows up. eh?? Don't pin your hopes on it. trump isn't. trump has already been named in an indictment for this, as individual 1 in Cohen's plea deal. Next comes the actual indictment with trump's name on it. Don't pretend to be shocked and horrified when it comes down, and it will. As usual, all hat and no cattle. Show us how Trump and Edwards are different. Facts are a stubborn thing.
|
|
|
Post by northsider on Dec 14, 2018 18:12:47 GMT -6
There's no comparison between what trump did and what Edwards did. See: US vs Cohen Further, please explain the functional differences between the Edwards case and this one ( other than the fact that Trump did in fact, use his own money ) This ought to be good. There probably isn’t much functional difference between the two cases. Your point?
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Dec 14, 2018 21:14:01 GMT -6
Further, please explain the functional differences between the Edwards case and this one ( other than the fact that Trump did in fact, use his own money ) This ought to be good. There probably isn’t much functional difference between the two cases. Your point? Your cohort says there is...…….. I simply want her to explain.
|
|
|
Post by northsider on Dec 14, 2018 21:30:59 GMT -6
There probably isn’t much functional difference between the two cases. Your point? Your cohort says there is...…….. I simply want her to explain. Just because there isn’t much difference in the cases doesn’t mean trump didn’t commit a crime
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2018 5:33:19 GMT -6
Well, we shall see how it unfolds, eh? I wish I could see your face when it all blows up. eh?? Don't pin your hopes on it. trump isn't. trump has already been named in an indictment for this, as individual 1 in Cohen's plea deal. Next comes the actual indictment with trump's name on it. Don't pretend to be shocked and horrified when it comes down, and it will.
Lay off the weed for a while, wouldja'?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2018 9:45:02 GMT -6
eh?? Don't pin your hopes on it. trump isn't. trump has already been named in an indictment for this, as individual 1 in Cohen's plea deal. Next comes the actual indictment with trump's name on it. Don't pretend to be shocked and horrified when it comes down, and it will.
Lay off the weed for a while, wouldja'?Absolutely No!
|
|
|
Post by rachelsalterego1 on Dec 15, 2018 9:57:45 GMT -6
Why aren't the Socialists/Libs raising holy hell over little Adam Schitt paying a 19 year old boy 400K for sexual harassment with taxpayer money?
|
|