|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Oct 6, 2013 13:37:36 GMT -6
"Obamacare", HAS ALREADY provided the ablility of college students to still be covered under their parent's Health Care provided by their employer past the age of 18. Greek, I guess you didn't know it, or chose to LIE about it, but I know of NO ONE, not a single person with private Insurance whose kids were cut off at age 18 IF they were going to College. Perhaps you could summon your vastly superior business knowledge and find us a plan that did kick them off at age 18? Or are you like Obama, taking credit for what you didn't accomplish? Like the statement above, got any real world stories of WORKING PARENTS who are now mystically covered in an affordable manner? How about you? Did you hop right on the website and get "affordable" insurance? Well?
|
|
|
Post by chevypower on Oct 7, 2013 0:16:29 GMT -6
You got Him in the corner again Sniper lol (facts are facts) no hiding around corners.
|
|
|
Post by chevypower on Oct 7, 2013 0:18:17 GMT -6
2014 Greek and the rest will realize it's all bs smoking mirrors, and the cost of healthcare will be outrages.
|
|
|
Post by greekgod on Oct 7, 2013 17:12:54 GMT -6
"Obamacare", HAS ALREADY provided the ablility of college students to still be covered under their parent's Health Care provided by their employer past the age of 18. Greek, I guess you didn't know it, or chose to LIE about it, but I know of NO ONE, not a single person with private Insurance whose kids were cut off at age 18 IF they were going to College. Perhaps you could summon your vastly superior business knowledge and find us a plan that did kick them off at age 18? Or are you like Obama, taking credit for what you didn't accomplish? Like the statement above, got any real world stories of WORKING PARENTS who are now mystically covered in an affordable manner? How about you? Did you hop right on the website and get "affordable" insurance Well? Sniper, Are you sure, before the Affordable Care Act, "Obamacare", the "children" were capable of being insured through the age of 26 on their parent's employer's Healthcare Policy? How about your plan as it currently exist, Snipe? You know, before the Affordable Care Act is fully implemented? g
|
|
|
Post by dog on Oct 7, 2013 17:16:11 GMT -6
Greek, I guess you didn't know it, or chose to LIE about it, but I know of NO ONE, not a single person with private Insurance whose kids were cut off at age 18 IF they were going to College. Perhaps you could summon your vastly superior business knowledge and find us a plan that did kick them off at age 18? Or are you like Obama, taking credit for what you didn't accomplish? Like the statement above, got any real world stories of WORKING PARENTS who are now mystically covered in an affordable manner? How about you? Did you hop right on the website and get "affordable" insurance Well? Sniper, Are you sure, before the Affordable Care Act, "Obamacare", the "children" were capable of being insured through the age of 26 on their parent's employer's Healthcare Policy? How about your plan as it currently exist, Snipe? You know, before the Affordable Care Act is fully implemented? g Re-read it Greek, you originally spoke about college kids over the age of 18, not just any kid over the age of 18. Sniper is correct and you are correct. College students could be included on a parents policy past the age of 18 and you are correct that as a result of ACA, any child could be on a parents policy until 26. Greek, you mis-spoke on your original post.
|
|
|
Post by greekgod on Oct 7, 2013 17:41:27 GMT -6
Sniper, Are you sure, before the Affordable Care Act, "Obamacare", the "children" were capable of being insured through the age of 26 on their parent's employer's Healthcare Policy? How about your plan as it currently exist, Snipe? You know, before the Affordable Care Act is fully implemented? g Re-read it Greek, you originally spoke about college kids over the age of 18, not just any kid over the age of 18. Sniper is correct and you are correct. College students could be included on a parents policy past the age of 18 and you are correct that as a result of ACA, any child could be on a parents policy until 26. Greek, you mis-spoke on your original post. dog, I stand corrected! Now, what do you believe? Should a Corporation, that provides the Healthcare benefits to their employees, as Sniper enjoys, cut off those benefits for his children at age 18? g
|
|
|
Post by dog on Oct 7, 2013 18:06:39 GMT -6
Re-read it Greek, you originally spoke about college kids over the age of 18, not just any kid over the age of 18. Sniper is correct and you are correct. College students could be included on a parents policy past the age of 18 and you are correct that as a result of ACA, any child could be on a parents policy until 26. Greek, you mis-spoke on your original post. dog, I stand corrected! Now, what do you believe? Should a Corporation, that provides the Healthcare benefits to their employees, as Sniper enjoys, cut off those benefits for his children at age 18? g Since I dont have any kids at that age, I dont really have any skin in the game.From a business standpoint, it would be hard to give you an answer that is sufficient in just a couple of sentences. Since the cost of doing business would be affected if a corpoartion would be paying premiums for spouses and kids compared to not paying for it. Each business and each employee's situation would be different. I think in Sniper's case, I would pay for his insurance and make him pay for his spouse and kids,no matter what their age. If that wasnt satisfactory, he is obviously free to look for another job with a company that had to ability for pay for his families insurance. If his total compensation package allows the corporation to make the profit they desire, and still provide insurance for him and his family, it would behoove them to do so.
|
|
|
Post by greekgod on Oct 7, 2013 18:45:41 GMT -6
dog, I stand corrected! Now, what do you believe? Should a Corporation, that provides the Healthcare benefits to their employees, as Sniper enjoys, cut off those benefits for his children at age 18? g Since I dont have any kids at that age, I dont really have any skin in the game.From a business standpoint, it would be hard to give you an answer that is sufficient in just a couple of sentences. Since the cost of doing business would be affected if a corpoartion would be paying premiums for spouses and kids compared to not paying for it. Each business and each employee's situation would be different. I think in Sniper's case, I would pay for his insurance and make him pay for his spouse and kids,no matter what their age. If that wasnt satisfactory, he is obviously free to look for another job with a company that had to ability for pay for his families insurance. If his total compensation package allows the corporation to make the profit they desire, and still provide insurance for him and his family, it would behoove them to do so.
|
|
|
Post by greekgod on Oct 7, 2013 19:04:10 GMT -6
dog, I stand corrected! Now, what do you believe? Should a Corporation, that provides the Healthcare benefits to their employees, as Sniper enjoys, cut off those benefits for his children at age 18? g Since I dont have any kids at that age, I dont really have any skin in the game.From a business standpoint, it would be hard to give you an answer that is sufficient in just a couple of sentences. Since the cost of doing business would be affected if a corpoartion would be paying premiums for spouses and kids compared to not paying for it. Each business and each employee's situation would be different. I think in Sniper's case, I would pay for his insurance and make him pay for his spouse and kids,no matter what their age. If that wasnt satisfactory, he is obviously free to look for another job with a company that had to ability for pay for his families insurance. If his total compensation package allows the corporation to make the profit they desire, and still provide insurance for him and his family, it would behoove them to do so. dog, I understand your difficulty in answering the question. You being self-employed and having employees,would have to know Sniper's Corporate "Pay Package" wouldn't you? I too am self-employed and do not begrudge Sniper any of his benes. Those of us on Main Street employing others have to face other issues than does Sniper and his "Corporate Nanny", don't we? If you know anyone who enjoys the Governement Healthcare benefit called MEDICARE, ask them if they have ever had better Medical Benefits. private or through their employer. And the response would be ''KEEP YOU HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE! g
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Oct 7, 2013 20:15:48 GMT -6
Should a Corporation, that provides the Healthcare benefits to their employees, as Sniper enjoys, cut off those benefits for his children at age 18? Not only yes, but hell yes. At the age of 18, they reach the age of Majority, and are considered Adults. I do believe that all plans currently keep them at 18 for a period of X after they graduate from High School, but certainly there is no reason to cover every kid until age 26, what's next, a piece of legislation that says they can live at home until they reach 26? Sounds like the old way was a really good way to encourage higher education.
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Oct 7, 2013 20:17:33 GMT -6
And the response would be ''KEEP YOU HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE! So now we do see that you have no "skin" in Obamacare! And yet you paint Longarm as a freeloader............... Have ye no shame man? Nevermind........
|
|
|
Post by greekgod on Oct 7, 2013 21:04:41 GMT -6
And the response would be ''KEEP YOU HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE! So now we do see that you have no "skin" in Obamacare! And yet you paint Longarm as a freeloader............... Have ye no shame man? Nevermind........ Sniper, You might want to re-read my post. g
|
|