|
|
Post by JimmyB2 on Apr 12, 2024 19:01:02 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by JimmyB2 on Apr 15, 2024 8:32:15 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by JimmyB2 on Apr 16, 2024 6:51:46 GMT -6
www.westernjournal.com/hillary-clinton-campaign-dnc-committed-crime-trump-prosecuted-bragg/Democrats are truly shameless in their efforts to “get Trump,” which was highlighted again on Monday as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against the presumptive Republican presidential nominee began. It places in high relief on the two-tiered system of justice in the United States, given the conduct of the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee during the 2016 presidential race, from which Braggs’ case against Donald Trump originates. Clinton and the DNC faced no criminal prosecution, but only had to pay a modest $113,000 in fines for covering up at least $1 million they paid to Fusion GPS through the Perkins Coie law firm to fund the infamous, unverified Steele dossier.
|
|
|
|
Post by JimmyB2 on Apr 17, 2024 13:11:54 GMT -6
Dershowitz is a true Democrat but a constitutional lawyer who speaks the truth.
Professor Dershowitz: Well, look, I’m looking for a fair election. I’m an American voter who hasn’t decided at this point who to vote for and who to vote against. I just want a fair election. … And this case is depriving the American public. I’m speaking for the American public, not for the candidates. Depriving the American public of the right to have a fair election.
President Trump should be in Pennsylvania today. There is a statute that gives him the right to leave the court any day. But the statute says, In the absence of an objection by the people. In other words, the prosecution has a veto over the judge’s decision whether to allow him to leave the courtroom on any given day. That is unconstitutional, and this case ought to be challenged. There ought to be a motion made by Trump’s lawyers immediately under Section 340.50, in which the judge has the power to allow him to leave the courtroom and campaign, but only if the prosecution agrees to it, which is clearly unconstitutional.
The gag order is unconstitutional. You cannot prevent a defendant from attacking the witnesses, from attacking the judge’s daughter, if the judge’s daughter could be a basis for disqualification.
I agree with Greg. The American public is sick and tired of seeing the legal system weaponized. Whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, whether you’re a Trump supporter or a Biden supporter, you should be equally appalled. We have the right to decide who to vote for without the thumb, or in this case, the elbow of the criminal justice system led by Democrats, in this case, the district attorney who campaigned on a promise to get Trump, essentially. We have a right not to have that election interference. Do you believe the judge- This case is paradigmatic election interference.
|
|
