Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2019 21:59:49 GMT -6
so he will be out of office and then indicted. even then there still would have to be iron clad evidence. what happens in his personal life doesnt effect me. what he does while president has a direct effect on me. It's not about you. It's about the rule of law. |
|
|
|
Post by dive61364 on Jan 7, 2019 22:04:20 GMT -6
many politicians from both political parties are crooked. if there is evidence he did something against the law i say hang him like any other criminal. according to the law he is innocent till proven guilty which is a long time down the road. just because many people hate trump doesn't make him guilty. a jury of his peers will decide that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2019 22:25:13 GMT -6
many politicians from both political parties are crooked. if there is evidence he did something against the law i say hang him like any other criminal. according to the law he is innocent till proven guilty which is a long time down the road. just because many people hate trump doesn't make him guilty. a jury of his peers will decide that. I agree. trump should not be persecuted because some people don't like him. On the other hand, trump should be prosecuted for violating law against the US, which makes some people not like him. |
|
|
|
Post by rachelsalterego1 on Jan 7, 2019 22:26:10 GMT -6
he will not be indicted while holding office is my guess. it would undermine the security of America according to the department of justice. if there was any Russian collusion, that would make a great case for his removal from office but there would have to be iron clad evidence. a bunch of crooked businessmen and a crooked attorney looking for an easy sentence isn't absolute evidence and Mueller knows it. as for campaign finance violations they are only fines at most. even Obama was found guilty of campaign violations while a sitting president. if the judge says to indict him it will undoubtedly happen after he leaves office if even then. once a president is in office it is almost impossible to remove him unless congress and the senate would some how agree which in this case seems highly unlikely. according to law scholars trump will remain in office till which time he is voted out or finishes a second term. i will give you the website which spells the 3 ways a sitting president can be removed or prosecuted 4iam. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/05/presidential-indictment/560957/No objection. It's very well the reason why trump has not been indicted (yet) or the indictment has been placed under seal waiting for that day. Good luck with that! Here's what happened to Obama for Campaign Finance violations- www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/01/07/obama-campaign-fined-big-for-hiding-donors-keeping-illegal-donations |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2019 22:32:42 GMT -6
They are not the same kind of campaign finance cases. It has nothing to do with one being obama and the other being trump. Read both and see if you can find the differences of the two. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2019 22:34:45 GMT -6
We're way off subject - yes??
|
|
|
|
Post by nextofkin on Jan 8, 2019 7:51:43 GMT -6
Yes, you're right. The republican-controlled Congress should have put his name on this shut down, but they're a bunch of trumperteer snowflakes and they didn't meet their obligations. So your contention is Democrats hold nor have any responsibility for this shut down. Then where is their and your logic then if the price of the wall/barrier costs xxxxxxxxx but the shut down is costing xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx more. Then if for nothing other than saving us more debt let alone providing National security why aren't the Democrats helping appropriating the money. If they did it is a win/win for all americans. Again I ask this very simple question. Do it for the sake of the National debt FOR EVERYONE and if no why not . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2019 7:57:35 GMT -6
Judging by what I watched on Morning Blo this morning him and Miku must think Trump will gain some momentum with the address tonight.
Will MSM carry it or do we have to watch it on cable..
|
|
|
|
Post by rachelsalterego1 on Jan 8, 2019 10:37:06 GMT -6
Judging by what I watched on Morning Blo this morning him and Miku must think Trump will gain some momentum with the address tonight. Will MSM carry it or do we have to watch it on cable.. All the major networks have announced they will carry it Jim. On Twitter #BoycottTrumpPrimeTime is the "top trend". Twitter is a Dem hotspot and Twitter routinely pushes crap like this, even when it's not trending they push "trends". Twitter also excludes trends they don't like. Perfect example was last evening....#EdBuck was blowing up Twitter but it wasn't even listed in the top 20.Ed Buck is a top Dem donor, who also happens to like gay black men. A 2nd "black gay male escort" was found dead at his house. |
|
|
|
Post by rachelsalterego1 on Jan 8, 2019 10:46:15 GMT -6
BTW Dems/Socialists, as for the National Emergency, Obama declared National Emergency 12 times when he was President.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
|
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Jan 8, 2019 11:02:18 GMT -6
But you see the need to dole out over twice as much to prop up South America? Niiiice. Was that in the republican-controlled Senate CR the Senate approved (without trump wall funding) prior to shut down?? Don't know, but it IS in the Democratic inspired bill passed. If you don't support it, then why don't you throw your little temper tantrums like you do at Trump? |
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Jan 8, 2019 11:04:18 GMT -6
Here again, lay it on us. It is getting old, just wait till tomorrow............. The Wolf is coming crap is getting very, very old. Hmmm. I thought I was clear? The one I'll pick to name is trump's campaign finance violation because it's already been presented in court, ruled on by a federal judge, making it a matter of fact. trump just hasn't been indicted, yet. Would this be the Cohen "violation" that isn't a violation? If so, you are even dumber than you appear. POST THE SPECIFIC STATUTE THEY WILL CHARGE HIM WITH. |
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Jan 8, 2019 11:05:34 GMT -6
so he will be out of office and then indicted. even then there still would have to be iron clad evidence. what happens in his personal life doesnt effect me. what he does while president has a direct effect on me. It's not about you. It's about the rule of law. No it is not, it is about keeping simpletons like yourself engaged......... Kind of like showing little girls unicorns. |
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Jan 8, 2019 11:06:23 GMT -6
They are not the same kind of campaign finance cases. It has nothing to do with one being obama and the other being trump. Read both and see if you can find the differences of the two. Yea, Obama actually VIOLATED the law. |
|
|
|
Post by toshiko on Jan 8, 2019 13:32:35 GMT -6
Trumpaganda, coming to prime time.
|
|
