|
Post by capncrunch on Jan 19, 2015 14:29:04 GMT -6
For the ones that have elderly relatives in nursing home or have care givers taking care of them in their homes. Or the ones that have babysitters/nannies ever thought about hiding cameras to see what goes on when your not home? Or ever thought of doing or not in the position, yet? How would you feel if not in the position about hiding cameras to catch wrong doing in care of relatives? Could also consider bullying in schools? That includes teachers bullying student, students bullying students, students bullying teachers?
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Jan 19, 2015 15:56:53 GMT -6
LOL, been there done that.
Lots of SMALL, unobtrusive cameras out there cheap. I have a couple that double as coat hooks you can mount on the wall, one that looks like a cheap battery powered clock radio, and one that literally is a USB memory stick, works exactly like one as well as being a camera.
None of them cost over 20 bucks on Ebay, all produce good video, and even have motion detect trip so you don't record all night for nothing.
Yea, they work.
|
|
|
Post by oldtimer on Jan 19, 2015 17:20:10 GMT -6
If you're not doing anything wrong then what do you care if there are cameras?
|
|
|
Post by Blue Star on Jan 19, 2015 17:35:27 GMT -6
ot, did you even read & comprehend what this is about? lol
|
|
|
Post by chevypower on Jan 20, 2015 0:41:22 GMT -6
At the same time I say it's a good idea, I also say if the Government ever made this a law...... it would be invasion of privacy, we wouldn't want the G man in our yard anymore than what they are now sorry jmo.
|
|
|
Post by dive61364 on Jan 20, 2015 8:29:00 GMT -6
At the same time I say it's a good idea, I also say if the Government ever made this a law...... it would be invasion of privacy, we wouldn't want the G man in our yard anymore than what they are now sorry jmo. they might already be in your backyard watching you. drones are being used at various law enforcement departments across the US in a pilot program as a surveillance tool. now everyone go out and look to the sky for an UFO.............
|
|
|
Post by dog on Jan 20, 2015 10:28:04 GMT -6
I have a couple of FLACK launchers sized in about 12 Ga. That might disrupt their flight pattern. I guess the challenge would be long range intercepts before they got video of you downing a drone. We need hi-tech butterfly nets....LOL I got this from the Today I found out website: Today, the maxim is still used as a guideline. However, as a property owner you only really have the right to the airspace above your land located in the lower stratum, the precise boundaries of which are not explicitly labelled. In the end, you are supposed to be entitled to enough airspace to reasonably enjoy the land below that air. However, exactly what this means is up for debate. For example, you can’t ask commercial planes to stop flying over your house, because the sky is considered to be a public highway. You could potentially, however, prosecute an overzealous news helicopter for hovering over your house if it was impeding your enjoyment of the land. Again, this would vary on a case-by-case basis but there have been instances of people being fined for trespassing for flying over someone’s land; so it’s not unheard of in US or British law. Today in the UK thanks to the Civil Aviation Act of 1982, the generally accepted amount of air above one’s roof a person is entitled to is approximately 500-1,000 feet, though again this isn’t a hard definition. Likewise, the United States has a similar estimation of about 500 feet, though this has never been officially ruled on by the Supreme Court. In both cases, this may be soon changing with the widespread introduction of drones, both personal, commercial, and those owned by the respective governments. As such, the U.S. federal government particularly has recently been looking into significantly lowering the airspace “public highway” floor to accommodate this type of aircraft.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 10:36:01 GMT -6
I think we need to have a drone season charge for a drone hunting license that would create revenue for Illinois.
|
|
|
Post by dumdave on Jan 20, 2015 11:04:26 GMT -6
I'll get out my Red Ryder!
|
|
|
Post by dive61364 on Jan 20, 2015 11:57:20 GMT -6
as far as drones go technology is advancing faster then the laws. I was at my local John Deere dealer last march. they were already selling drones to farmer to check their fields out for diseases or pests. if drones where being used for farming you had to know the government had already utilized this technology for law enforcement purposes. the department of natural resources have been using drones to catch poachers and check deer herds in Illinois for the past year.
|
|
|
Post by dog on Jan 20, 2015 12:11:43 GMT -6
. It really is pretty creepy to think some one would buzz by your window with a camera mounted. Isn't that really the same as a 'Peeping Tom'? Only difference is that he has electronic eyeballs and his feet are not actually on your property. Robbers could use it to case your place too. Any Lawyers want to chime in on this? ROMAN?? Anyone else? Thats why I posted that little blurb about who owns "air space" above your property.
|
|
|
Post by capncrunch on Jan 20, 2015 12:13:04 GMT -6
With that drone, down the line you will be able to order something off of Amazon(just for example), in the morning, and will have by evening. Just hopefully the drone don't show pictures on the internet of people having sex. Just some people I really don't want that in my head. LOL
|
|
|
Post by OutlawwithaSnipeSniper on Jan 20, 2015 12:44:50 GMT -6
MM, FAA regs say no higher than 400 feet and must be in sight, roughly akin to a radio controlled plane.
They just busted a guy flying at something like 2,000 feet near an airport.
|
|
|
Post by capncrunch on Jan 20, 2015 13:52:25 GMT -6
Pretty sure they have a general rule of thumb that you are supposed to maintain line of sight with the drone you are piloting. So you should be within a half mile or so, maybe less in town with all the obstructions. It really is pretty creepy to think some one would buzz by your window with a camera mounted. Isn't that really the same as a 'Peeping Tom'? Only difference is that he has electronic eyeballs and his feet are not actually on your property. Robbers could use it to case your place too. Any Lawyers want to chime in on this? ROMAN?? Anyone else? Those drones could be used against the "cop killers" or to protect the cops when they are at a crime scene. I'm sure those drones would of done some help as far as that Ferguson, Missouri. I'm sure that the law enforcement may use them for their protection. As a citizen, we need to know that with this technology now out, that we could be recorded, without our knowledge at any given time. I would think, it would be consider "Peeping Tom" . But we have to consider, with these drones coming out, that we really don't have any privacy, even on our own property. And these lawyers will take advantage of these drones.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2015 14:13:46 GMT -6
Construction business near San Franscp has drone that are being used for bulldozers. So down the line, construction is be taken over by drones and not humans.
|
|